BONDPublished scales · Evidence behind every reading
When it gets close,
do you worry or step back?
Two axes of closeness
Easy closeness
Watchful closeness
Calm distance
Unspoken worry
Middle ground
- Free
- About 4 min
- 23 items
- No sign-up
Answer the statements and get your scores for relationship insecurity and emotional distance, and the place where the two meet, with your capacity for love and things you could try.
Two scores clear of the middle put you in one of four places; scores near the middle are read as the ground in between.
What you will discover
What this report
tells you
A report in 7 chapters. Every interpretation shows the scores it rests on.
- 01
At a glance
Your three scale scores and your place on the two axes
- 02
Relationship insecurity
How often you check that the relationship is safe
- 03
Emotional distance
How much you keep feelings to yourself
- 04
Capacity for love
How readily you show and accept care
- 05
The two dimensions together
Where worry and distance meet, and what that place means
- 06
Things you could try
Options, not answers, for where you are now
- 07
Method and limits
What it was measured with, and how far to trust it
In your report
- Your position on three scales
- A two-dimension map of worry and distance
- Day-to-day readings tied to your scores
- Options to pick from
How it works
What to expect
You can stop at any point and pick up where you left off.
Relationships and expressing feelings
14 items, one per screen. Choose one of 5 answers for each.
Care given and received
9 items, one per screen. Choose one of 5 answers for each.
Get your report
Your report is built as soon as you finish, and is saved on this device only.
Sources
Based on
Where the items and scoring come from, with the licence and translation notes for each.
IPIP CAT-PD-SF: Relationship Insecurity, Emotional Detachment
Simms, L. J., Goldberg, L. R., Roberts, J. E., Watson, D., Welte, J., & Rotterman, J. H. (2011). Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: Introducing the CAT-PD project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 380-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.577475. Items and scoring key: International Personality Item Pool, CAT-Personality Disorder Scales Static Form (CAT-PD-SF, v1.1), scales Relationship Insecurity (7 items) and Emotional Detachment (7 items).
- Licence
- Public domain. IPIP home page (https://ipip.ori.org/): "The items and scales are in the public domain, which means that one can copy, edit, translate, or use them for any purpose without asking permission and without paying a fee." IPIP permission page (https://ipip.ori.org/newPermission.htm): "Because the IPIP has been placed in the public domain, permission has already been automatically granted for any person to use IPIP items, scales, and inventories for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial".
- Translation
- The English items are the IPIP originals, unchanged. The Korean items and response labels are an in-house translation by Human.ai that has not been separately validated.
IPIP-VIA: Capacity for Love
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press/Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Items and scoring key: International Personality Item Pool, The Items Included in Each of the 24 Revised IPIP-VIA Scales, scale Capacity for Love (9 items).
- Licence
- Public domain. IPIP home page (https://ipip.ori.org/): "The items and scales are in the public domain, which means that one can copy, edit, translate, or use them for any purpose without asking permission and without paying a fee." IPIP permission page (https://ipip.ori.org/newPermission.htm): "Because the IPIP has been placed in the public domain, permission has already been automatically granted for any person to use IPIP items, scales, and inventories for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial".
- Translation
- The English items are the IPIP originals, unchanged. The Korean items and response labels are an in-house translation by Human.ai that has not been separately validated.
International Personality Item Pool (IPIP)
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007. International Personality Item Pool: A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality Traits and Other Individual Differences (https://ipip.ori.org/). Internet Web Site.
- Licence
- Public domain. IPIP home page (https://ipip.ori.org/): "The items and scales are in the public domain, which means that one can copy, edit, translate, or use them for any purpose without asking permission and without paying a fee." IPIP permission page (https://ipip.ori.org/newPermission.htm): "Because the IPIP has been placed in the public domain, permission has already been automatically granted for any person to use IPIP items, scales, and inventories for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial".
Good to know
Human.ai is for adults aged 19 and over. The first time you start, we ask for your date of birth once. The date is not stored.
Your answers are scored on this device to make the report. Afterwards you can add an AI interpretation if you want one. Your scores are sent to Anthropic, PBC, in the United States only if you ask for it and agree. Your answers to individual questions are never sent. AI interpretations are written by generative AI. They are not written by a person or individually reviewed by a professional.
Read more in the privacy policy
- This report is reference material for self-understanding. Do not use it as the basis for important decisions such as hiring, admissions or legal judgements.
- It is not a medical or psychological diagnosis and says nothing about the state of your health.
- It does not assign an attachment style. The scales used were not built to measure attachment.
- The Korean items are an in-house translation that has not been separately validated. No figures comparing you with other people (norms, percentiles) are provided.